Sacco And Vanzetti


The case of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was not about the justice system blaming
them for murdering two people, but rather how the justice system murdered two people and got
away with it. Throughout the trial the public withdrew from their anti-radical thinking to more of
a sympathetic understanding of another human being, no matter their beliefs. World-wide interest
was quickly turned to the ill-fated Sacco and Vanzetti. While the judge and prosecution had
already delivered the verdict in their minds, Sacco and Vanzetti proclaimed and defended their
innocence even till the very end.
Before the crime ever took place Sacco worked at the Milford Shoe Factory as an edge
trimmer. Sacco was a hard worker; who supported his wife, Rosa, and his son, Dante. Vanzetti
worked as a fish peddler. In May 1917, both left their jos to go to Mexico and avoid the draft.
Both Sacco and Vanzetti had the same views which were considered radical at the time; therefore
they did not advertise them. Understandably, they feared for their safety as well as their friends
and families who shared the same ideals (Feuerlicht 11). Although some had suspected that they
were of radical ideology, it was not publicaly announced. Having avoided the draft, Sacco and
Vanzetti returned from Mexico. Upon their return, organizations and federal agents started to
investigate.
On April 15, 1920 there was a payroll robbery of the Slater & Morrill Shoe Company.
Two men were killed and $15,773. 59 missing. These crimes happened in South Braintree
Massachusetts and became known as the Braintree Crimes. There were two people that attacked
and killed the payroll employees, then grabbed the money and took off in the escape car. The
escape car was described as a black Buick with other partners inside. Eyewitnesses claimed that
two of the criminals ?looked Italian? (Altman 70). Crimes like this had been common at the time
and had only sparked local interest (D'Attilio).
It was not until Sacco and Vanzetti were in the courtroom facing charges of murder and
robbery, that the Braintree Crimes would become a publicized affair. Sacco and Vanzetti were
arrested on May 5, 1920 for the murders and robberies that took place three weeks earlier. They
both were anarchistic, atheist, draft dodgers, immigrants, and neither could speak English well
(Fabulous 26). This undoubtedly made them an easy target. When questioned they both lied
creating a ?consciousness of guilt? in the eyes of the prosecutors and judge (D'Attilio). Another
aspect that did not help Sacco and Vanzetti were their alibis. Although both had an alibi, their
witnesses often could not remember much about the day in question other than they defiantly saw
the defendants. Sacco's alibi rested on his repeated attempt to get passports to Italy to see his
family. Vanzetti was allegedly selling fish and visiting some friends (Montgomery 142-155,
131-141). Percy Katzmann, the prosecutor, had given both a difficult time with the questioning.
He used their lack of English skills against them and often twisted their words around. Although
Moore, the defendant's lawyer would object to this, Judge Thayer would allow it to continue and
often encourage it.
Judge Thayer was unprofessional by making rude comments during and out of court. He
would refer to Sacco and Vanzetti as ?Dagoes? never referring to them as Italians (Feuerlight
202). He would also talk about the case outside of court and brag to others saying ?Did you see
what I did with those anarchistic bastards the other day? I guess that will hold them for a while.?
(Feuerlight 306). Not only was his behavior questionable, but the fact that he was the judge of the
case was questionable, since he had just sentenced Vanzetti for another case a few weeks prior.
Fortunately for Sacco and Vanzetti, their lawyer was dedicated and fought for their
freedom. Moore raised awareness to the trial worldwide. Supporters protested for Sacco and
Vanzetti's freedom. After six weeks of trial Sacco and Vanzetti were found guilty of murder and
robbery. Though they were found guilty, their lawyer still fought for appeals and continued to
spend money on propaganda. Since the anarchist movement had been paying for the trial and all
the spending that Moore was doing, they fired him. Moore was replaced in 1924 by William
Thompson (D'Attillio).
Thompson made appeal after appeal, and more and more evidence proving Sacco and
Vanzetti's innocence surfaced as he fought for an appeal. On November 16, 1925 a man in sitting
in Dedham Jail was given the financial report of the Sacco and Vanzetti